By George P. Hassett
The Somerville Divestment Project is back. The polarizing group that has brought hundreds to City Hall to protest and support Israeli policies in the Middle East, is pushing another non-binding ballot question to city voters in November.
The resolution would direct State Rep. Denise provost, D-Somerville, to “vote in favor of a non-binding resolution calling on the federal government to support the right of all people, including non-Jewish Palestinians of Israel, to live free from laws that give more rights to people of one religion than another.” Provost’s district covers roughly two-thirds of the city.
A similar measure calling for the “right of all refugees, including Palestinian refugees to return to their land of origin,” failed with 45 percent of the vote in 2006, according to SDP organizer Ron Francis. Another 2006 question called provost to support “all governmental entities of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to sell any investments they hold either in Israel Bonds or in companies that supply Military equipment to Israel.” That measure failed with 31 percent of the vote.
SDP has divided Somerville citizens over a seemingly far away conflict in another part of the world since 2004. That year, on Nov. 8 hundreds crowded City Hall to support and oppose an SDP resolution that all city investors sell their Israel bonds along with their stock in six companies – including General Electric – that build Israeli weapons. The crowd that night had their backpacks and packages checked by eight city police officers at the front entrance of City Hall.
The measure gave mayor Joseph A. Curtatone the opportunity – in front of a crowd in the Aldermanic Chambers that filled all 90 seats, lined the walls three and four deep and overflowed into the hallway - to weigh in on the foreign conflict.
“Fair and just treatment of the Palestinian people residing in the territories is essential to building peace in the region. However I also support Israel’s right to defend itself and safeguard it’s people,” Curtatone said. “The Retirement Board’s Chief responsibility is to secure the highest rate of return possible for the fund. In rare exceptions, the moral imperative is so clear and unambiguous as to warrant divestment. This is not such a case.”
Curtatone said if passed he would veto the resolution. The public hearing that followed featured a former Israel soldier being hissed at and accusations that opponents of the measure had “the blood of dead Palestinians” on their hands.
Since that meeting, SDP has alienated some of its own members by stepping up their rhetoric and describing the policies of the Israeli government as “apartheid.”
SDP member Bob Cable said this time around, “controversy is inevitable,” and he expects some opposition.
Besides Iraq (thanks to US); Isreal is the only real democracy in that area and a true friend. We need to support them 110%! I would prefer to see these misguided fools at SDP direct Provost to back a resolution to strike Iran immediately. Turn Tehran into a parking lot. We can not allow Islamicfacists like Mr. of Iran to have nukes.
Posted by: Imux | July 29, 2008 at 10:22 PM
Bill/Ron/b00b/Craig, you and your liberal farleft freak friends (PDS.. Carl, Rebeccah) must be depressed today. Your terrorist friends are losing - McCain and I were right that the surge worked and killing them over there, so we don't have to kill them over here (or in Isreal) was a winner. I hate to say "I told you moonbats so, but I told you moonbats so!"
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The number of U.S. soldiers killed in combat in Iraq has dropped sharply this month, putting July on track to have the lowest casualties for the military since the U.S.-led invasion of the country in 2003.
Posted by: Imux | July 30, 2008 at 09:01 AM
The Surge, when it was first initiated, had a very clear objective - to bring about political reconciliation by creating a safe haven for politicians to work. The Surge has been a contributor to the lowering of violence - in addition to the Sunni awakening (which began prior to the surge, no matter what the senile brain of John McCain wants him and us to believe) where we simply started paying insurgents not to fight us, and the Sadrists momentarily not murdering people (again having nothing to do with the Surge).
Anywho, the original metric for success of the surge, political reconciliation is at best a work in progress (about the only thing the Iraqi parliament and public can agree on is that they want the US out around 2010, agreeing with Senator Obama). So, saying that the Surge "worked" while not actually going into the complexities of the situation (what exactly "success" was understood to be, and the other contributors to the reduction in violence Iraq has recently seen) is mendacious propaganda fit for small minds.
Meanwhile, flip-flopping John McCain now supports a time table (even if he'll lie and say he never used that word), a time table supported by the American public, Senator Obama, the Iraqi government, and the Iraqi public.
If Senator McCain wants to be President of the Surge, then I'm sure the American people can have a float constructed for him and he can be entered in parades, where he may roll down the street waving to the people. Back in the real-world, the conversation over when to begin reducing troop levels in Iraq is effectively over - all that matters is getting a President into office that will respect the desires of the American public.
Posted by: Rollinson | July 30, 2008 at 02:08 PM
Really, who cares what the Mayor of Somerville thinks about this international issues. Local poltiicians should focus on local issues. Really.
Posted by: JPM | July 30, 2008 at 02:57 PM
Rollinson (Dr-No!), you limpwristed libaloons can never admit when things are going good or the US does something positive. Why don't you just save everyone some time and go to Pakistan and get trained (like Obama) in a madras. That way our soldiers - who you denigrate at every turn - can blow your brians out OVER THERE, so WE DON'T HAVE TO DO IT OVER HERE! and take b00b with you, please.
Friggin' moonbat traitors.
Posted by: Imux | July 30, 2008 at 03:18 PM
Why would the federal government care about a resolution from the Massachusetts State Delegation supporting this matter. Do the members of the SDP realize how fruitless their efforts are in this regard. I support representive Provost in the handling of issues pertaining to the state of Massachusetts and the City of Somerville. Why don't you bother Capuano with this crap. The SDP is a waste of time and panders to a forum that has zero influence on the matter. Learn how government operates you morons! Even if a ballot measure is adopted and approved by the voters...what do you think you are accomplishing. Please go elsewhere if you are going to waste time and resourses.
Posted by: idiots | July 30, 2008 at 04:20 PM
I wish Ron Francis would pick on somebody else other than Somerville. As I recall, Ron's own union retirement plan invests in Israel. What is he doing about that? Leave us alone.
Maybe you can look into that George.
Posted by: Plenty | July 30, 2008 at 05:11 PM
Is Israel perfect? No. Are they worth supporting over any Arab country? Absolutely.
Posted by: JPM | July 30, 2008 at 08:20 PM
I-hole's comments are not very germane to the article. Nor are they well-articulated, thought-out, or truthful. Hittin' the bottle a little early today, are you? :-)
Posted by: Craig | July 30, 2008 at 09:14 PM
I can see from Imux's comments that he is a very angry zionist.Calling liberals moonbats,far left freaks,limp wristed liberal loons,etc.and he wants the US to bomb Iran and stay in Iraq.I don't think any more Americans should die for Israel and AIPAC .Bring the troops home and no war against Iran.
Posted by: Darren | July 31, 2008 at 01:17 AM
Mr. Rollinson, you have apparently been listening, unfortunately, to the likes of Nancy Pelosi. No, that was not the purpose of the surge. It was a convenient after-effect certainly, but it was not the purpose. Let's face it, the surge has accomplished much and people like Pelosi and Obama simply cannot admit that it was a good thing. In fact, Obama is so caught up in his own public image, he never seems able to admit when he is wrong.
Posted by: Listen and Learn | July 31, 2008 at 09:25 AM
Imux,
Good thing no one knows who you are because you were just handled rather easily by this Rollinson. Not only did he outwit you on the facts concerning the surge but your retort is to resort to name calling. "Libaloons" "moonbats" what the hell did they teach you at that conservative school you went to anyway? Get back inside your cave you fat idiot! I hope you never show your "imux" name on this forum ever again.
Posted by: Pete | July 31, 2008 at 02:23 PM
We are so sick of SDP telling lies about Israel and supporting the Arab terrorists.SDP should admit how much they hate jews.They want to see Israelis kicked out of their land and killed by Arabs.Why do they hate jews so much?
Posted by: Stokes | August 01, 2008 at 03:59 AM
THE SURGE!!!!! Are you people stupid or what?
Posted by: William Hurst | August 01, 2008 at 07:12 AM
Surge worked - fact.
Liberls - won't admit it and actively root for the terrorists - FACT.
Liberal, moonbats should be shot and then put on a trial for treason - FACT.
Moonbats, who do you hate the troops? Why do you hate your own country? Obama coundn't even take 5 minutes to visit wounded troops - and this radical is your candidate?
Posted by: Imux | August 01, 2008 at 10:03 AM
headlining the group as "anti-israel" is it's own kind of propaganda.
why is any criticism of the policies of the israeli government branded as hating israel or hating jews? or supporting terrorists? this kind of rhetoric only underscores the notion that the deck is stacked against any fair coverage of the very complicated middle east situation and it's history.
if you don't like the assembly square development, does that mean you are 'anti-somerville'? or an italian-american hater?
should everyone who generally supports israel be labeled 'anti-palestinian' whenever they are referred to?
Posted by: spin city | August 01, 2008 at 11:04 AM
These groups are Anti-Israel and Anti-Israeli. Fact, Anti-Israeli groups constantly overlook and ignore the fact that the Palestinian people are the ones who break the peace and commit acts of terrorism. Does anyone here know of any suicide bombings committed by Israelis? Is Israel launching rockets into Palestine for no other reason but to kill innocent people, or is this something that Palestine does for no other reason but to kill civilians and cause terror. Israels neighbors of Muslim faith wish for nothing more than to see her country destroyed and that all Jews be put to death. I am not Jewish and I could never imagine what it is like to be treated like animals and hunted for thousands of years.
Posted by: William Hurst | August 04, 2008 at 10:43 AM
SDP should be run out of Somerville ! Why are these jew haters allowed to spread these lies about Israel and the jews? I hope all jews and Christians join together to protest these SDP anti-semites.We need to send the message loud and clear Somerville will not tolerate SDP and their campaign of hate and fear.Please ask the Mayor to do something about this.
Posted by: Stokes | August 05, 2008 at 08:49 AM
How many of the current SDP'ers actually live in Provost's district, or in Somerville at all?
Posted by: Ron Newman | August 05, 2008 at 10:20 AM
Accusations of anti-semitism mean nothing at this point because they have been abused and overused over the decades to silence perfectly legitimate critics of Israeli policies. It is rather clear that Israel has become a national security threat for the US, at this point. Things will resolve themselves as we become less dependent on oil and we won't need them anymore as a US proxy to defend our oil supply in the ME. Nonetheless, I don't see why Somerville has to get involved with this issue.
Posted by: Somerville n00b | August 05, 2008 at 10:33 AM
b00b, you really are a hateful anit-semite. Sickening. I hope Osama finds you, throws a dirty blanket over your head and makes you his 43rd wife. Do you even think he'd take you? I mean there are camels better looking than you.
You liberals are so stupid.
Posted by: Imux | August 05, 2008 at 05:23 PM
The Democrat 'Energy Plan'
1. You can't drill for oil anywhere.
2. You can't build a refinery anywhere.
3. You can't build a nuclear power plant anywhere.
4. You can't burn coal for electricity.
5. You can't allow the oil companies to reinvest their profits into exploration.
6. But you can drive up the price of food by subsidizing an ethanol industry that takes land out of food production while using more energy than it creates.
7. You must continue to tax every gallon of gas that we put in our tanks.
8. You must threaten all energy users with additional 'carbon taxes'.
9. And just in case some entrepreneur out there somewhere may have an idea for an alternative energy concept that just might work, you must raise the capital gains tax so that investors have less capital and less incentive to invest in his/her project.
Count your blessings. With the coming change in administration, it will be a wonder if the price of gasoline doesn't get to $10 per gallon.
Posted by: Imux | August 05, 2008 at 05:52 PM