Property taxes are going up for homeowners in Somerville. In a unanimous vote on December 5, aldermen approved 2008 property tax rates for commercial and residential taxpayers. Under the new rates, the average owner-occupied two-family home will see an annual tax increase of $47 or 1.2 percent, the average one-family home will see an increase of $55 or 1.9 percent and the average condominium tax bill will increase annually by $9 or 0.5 percent.
In a presentation to the Board by City Assessor Dick Brescia and his staff, Assistant Assessor Marc Levye noted that, while property values were down across the region, Somerville’s real estate prices were more stable than those in many other areas. “If you’ve been following all of the media reports, they paint quite a ‘gloom-and-doom’ picture for the market in general, but they also show that, here in Somerville, we’ve held our own. We’ve fared better than a lot of communities and, while we’re definitely down from last year, we haven’t taken quite the hit that other communities have,” Levye said.
Mayor Joseph A. Curtatone said most of the city’s taxpaying property is residential forcing the tax burden onto homeowners.
“In Somerville, we’re gradually building our up our commercial base but 85 percent of our taxpaying property is residential. Since 2001, however, we’ve minimized the impact of
property taxes on homeowners with a 30 percent residential exemption. We also offer specific exemptions for seniors, veterans and the disabled.”
The Board also voted to renew all of the city’s residential tax exemptions for the coming year. The new residential tax rate will be $10.95 per $1,000 of assessed valuation.
And what is it I'm getting for the increaased taxes? Is the city going to shovel my sidewalk? Will they come get the garbage can from my back yard for me? Will they clear the snow off my car every morning? Are they going to rebuild the East Somerville school?
It'd be nice to get a reason for the tax increase...
Posted by: Derek | December 16, 2007 at 03:27 PM
Can anyone explain why a condiminium owner is facing a much smaller increase? And not just the rate itself, but the percentage of increase is much smaller.
Also, this shows how, even when property values go down, taxes can still go up. Explaining once again why many longtime homeowners 'cash in' and sell.....the value of the home they've owned for 50 years suddenly increases, which means their taxes increase also. They often can't afford the increased taxes, and get no benefit from the increased value unless they sell. It's a double-edged sword, for sure.
Posted by: Taxes | December 16, 2007 at 03:29 PM
Seriously, what's the rationale for the differential increase? It seems unfair to me. Why are single-family owners penalized? Increases should affect ALL residential properties the same way, percentwise. Why is the tax increase to the owner of a 400K condo 4 times lees than that to the owner of a 400K single home?
Can somebody report on what kind of properties the aldermen own? I suspect there may be a conflict of interest here.
Posted by: Election | December 16, 2007 at 04:31 PM
When your MAYOR does not own and gets a very large raise in his salary, the ALDERPERSONS get a very large salary increase along with the SCHOOL COMMITTEE person and the DPW can afford a big new Caddy for his wife along with the other perks. THAT IS WHY YOUR TAXES GO UP AFTER THE ELECTION.You don't think that he would have the big one's to tell before do you BUT BEAN knew!
Posted by: You | December 16, 2007 at 04:32 PM
Rereading the article, there is some ambiguity. Were the rates different because of different average increases in property values (thus resulting in de facto differential increase rates - single family homes appreciated the most, and so on)? Or were they set by the Aldermen ad hoc?... I think it's the first one.
Posted by: Election | December 17, 2007 at 12:40 AM
Are we paying for the cost of city services, or for the 'value' of our properties? This is the exact reason so many long time residents 'cash in' and sell their homes. People think they do it for the pay out, but they do it because they've owned a home for 50 years - the home has changed very little, city services have changed very little, and yet the 'value' has increased, and property taxes increase with that. You receive a benefit from an increase in a property's value only when you sell the property. Other than that, you experience a loss because of the increase in taxes. There are many who simply cannot afford it. And I would venture to guess that property values have dropped at least a little this year. However, city spending has increased, and that's really what it's all about. This is their way of paying for their salaries and their perks.
And for this I'm supposed to pay more taxes AND get the East Somerville School stocked with supplies?
Posted by: Taxes | December 17, 2007 at 05:59 AM
Hey - we are the ones who elected all the city officials back into office. This is totally crazy - the city of boston's taxes are going down. As for city services - 1) these F###en snow plows keep plowing me in after shoveling out my driveway (it happened to me 6 times yesterday and the guys in the truck go by and laugh at you) (2) the trash collectors have totally destroyed my barrel's that I put out and they are never left in front of my own home, I have to walk 2 houses down to get mine back. What the HELL is happening to this city??? Really there is no one to blame but the people who elect the same officials back into office. Bad time to sell my home but I think I'll rent it out and buy elsewhere now. It's a shame.
Posted by: snowbunny | December 17, 2007 at 08:45 AM
LOL. Also, can somebody explain to me WHY, the super duper cyber city system does not allow one to pay a water bill online AFTER the deadline?
Posted by: Election | December 17, 2007 at 09:03 AM
This increase is substantially less than inflation. City costs include health insurance premiums for everyone, salaries, people get COLAs. Of course property taxes go up each year and all things considered this is a trivial increase.
Posted by: Brittain33 | December 17, 2007 at 10:22 AM
Funny that people in Somerville who cannot afford health insurance, despite the brilliant MA plan, still have to pay for some stranger's health insurance and bonuses. Perhaps for those same cops who do nothing all day, just standing at public construction sites on Somerville Av!
>>
City costs include health insurance premiums for everyone, salaries, people get COLAs.
>>
Posted by: Election | December 17, 2007 at 10:36 AM
I'm not really interested in whether this increase has any correlation to the rate of inflation. Most private sector employees (myself included) do not get a raise because of the rate of inflation. It is annoying that city and state employees get this as a matter of course, and I am expected to pay for it.
I see that noone can explain the differences in the percent of the increase. Do condo owners have a better lobby? Or is it part of the city's overall scheme (giveaway) to developers, by allowing them to promise their owners cheaper taxes than what is paid by the riffraff. Again, the city seems to be bending over backwards for people who come in and buy over-priced condos, and noone cares about the poor homeowner who can't afford to live here!
Posted by: Homes/Condos | December 17, 2007 at 11:09 AM
Sounds to me like condominiums simply didn't appreciate in value as much as other residential properties, so their tax bills went up less.
Posted by: Ron Newman | December 17, 2007 at 11:22 AM
Condo property taxes are paid per unit. Based on the coverage here, it seems to me each unit will increase by .5%. A home with 6 condo units would actually have an overall increase of 3% - more than a single family. Maybe I'm reading it incorrectly.
Posted by: seriously | December 17, 2007 at 11:38 AM
Your answers are irrlevant. Many condo units are larger than a single family home in the city. Why, then, would their increase be .5%. while a single family would see an increase of 1.9%? The number of units doesn't matter because each unit owner pays the taxes, regardless of how many units are in the building. And I would suspect that condo units perhaps appreciated more than single family homes in the city. And I think there should be a decision made as to whether we are paying taxes based on appreciation or the cost of services. Our taxes go up when value goes up, but when values go down, the taxes do not also go down, and we're told we have to cover the cost of city services. Which is it???
Posted by: Irrelevant | December 17, 2007 at 12:18 PM
Our taxes go up when value goes up,
Did taxes double between '99 and '05 when values did? No. They went up, but not as much as values did. When they did go up, it had more to do with cuts in state aid than rising property values.
I know I sound like PR for the city, but cripes, Somerville has the best of both worlds on property taxes. We get high state aid because of our overall low incomes, which shifts a lot of city costs from property owners to the state, and we don't have the same education costs as other towns because we have so many childless people here as a share of the population. People in NJ and NH, not to mention plenty of towns in Massachusetts, would kill to have a 1.1% tax rate with a big residential exemption.
No one likes to pay more in taxes and sure we can all think of ways the city isn't spending money wisely, but this is nothing.
Posted by: Brittain33 | December 17, 2007 at 01:27 PM
And I would suspect that condo units perhaps appreciated more than single family homes in the city.
Why would you guess that? A lot of condos just appeared in the last couple of years out of old rentals, and it looks like anyone who invested in one lost his shirt. Single-family homes have been around a lot longer and have had more of a sustained run-up in values.
Posted by: Brittain33 | December 17, 2007 at 01:30 PM
This is the key point, I think:
>> The new residential tax rate will be $10.95 per $1,000 of assessed valuation. <<
That means that a 400K condo would pay the same taxes as a 400K single-family. But, according to the numbers, a 400K condo only appreciated 0.5% on average, whereas a 400K single-family appreciated 1.9%. But what numbers are these? MA? Somerville? Why isn't there a public document explaining in detail how these numbers were calculated?
Posted by: Election | December 17, 2007 at 01:57 PM
> Based on the coverage here, it seems to me each unit will increase by .5%. A home with 6 condo units would actually have an overall increase of 3% - more than a single family.
No, if each unit increases by 0.5%, then the total obviously must increase by 0.5% as well.
Posted by: Ron Newman | December 17, 2007 at 03:16 PM
> what numbers are these? MA? Somerville? Why isn't there a public document explaining in detail how these numbers were calculated?
The assessor's office knows what type of property each tax bill is associated with, so it's pretty simple math for them to calculate the average rate increase for each type.
Posted by: Ron Newman | December 17, 2007 at 03:18 PM
snowbunny;
let us know when you move..one lesss whiner:>)My gut feeling is that Freddie B, Marty M and anyone Carl S endorsed were not going to lower any of our taxes! Longtime folks have moved out cause they can't stand not having regular folks living next door to them any longer all replaced by snowbunnies
I like rabbit my rabbit rare
Posted by: I like rabbit fer dinnah | December 17, 2007 at 10:19 PM
Ok, the assessor's office knows. Why cannot the rest of us know? For what I know they are making up numbers...
Posted by: Election | December 17, 2007 at 11:38 PM
I deduce it is more important to get the snow piles away from SOD territory than it is by the Schools and other City buildings.
The DPW was working early hours this morning in Ball Square removing snow from the sidewalks and parking areas around the entire Square. Three dump trucks and front end loaders were scrapping the snow away and hauling it to who knows where, probably the Homans building parking lot.
Why not clear the corners to the schools so the children can be seen rather than exposing them to vehicular traffic that possibly, can not see the little people? No, SOD gets them to clear the square for personnel reasons I am sure.
My taxes, as well as all citizens of Somerville are just being wasted on the wrong things.
The Mole
Posted by: The Mole | December 18, 2007 at 05:35 AM
that is funny MOLE because Ball Square looked pretty unshoveled to me. I am surprised you didn't blame the snow on SOD.....
Posted by: Paul | December 20, 2007 at 09:35 PM
I know this is a late post but many of you seem quite confused!
If Somerville is taxing us on a % basis, then taxes automatically go up when housing value goes up.
There is absolutely no excuse for increasing this % unless we are getting more services, or there was an unexpected price decline and services we care a lot about are being cut. Inflation has NOTHING to do with this as home prices usually keep up well with it.
Posted by: Jason | March 26, 2008 at 05:01 PM
What a fantastic blog!!I loved how detailed each of the entries were.They were well balanced - fun and informative. Thanks for this.
Deirdre G
Posted by: Philippines property | November 11, 2009 at 08:14 PM