(The opinions and views expressed in the commentaries of The Somerville News belong solely to the authors of those commentaries and do not reflect the views or opinions of The Somerville News, its staff or publishers.)
Charles Chisholm is a candidate for Ward 6 alderman this year, and he sat with us at our last contributors meeting, where some of us have known him almost our entire lives and to others he was a new face in a real race. He is no stranger to local politics. His professional and political careers started around the same time in the mid to late 1960s, and there seems no slowing down for him 40 years later.
A life-long resident of the city, Chisholm grew up in East Somerville where he lived until 1982, when he moved to College Avenue and still lives today. That was the year he started working at Bunker Hill Community College (BHCC) as a math professor. When he retired from there in 2003, he was the head of the math department for the college.
“I started teaching in 1967 at the Northeastern Junior High School, and I truly enjoyed the last 40 years in the profession,” he said.
He may be retired, but still teaches a course here and there at BHCC – something he said he will probably keep doing for years.
Chisholm got his taste in the local political scene when he was only 18 years old, supporting a candidate who ended up losing.
“My introduction to Somerville politics was like being punched in the face,” he said.
That didn’t stop him for becoming a candidate – he ran unsuccessfully for state representative in 1968 and for Ward 1 School Committee in 1969, again unsuccessfully. In his second attempt at School Committee in 1971, he fared better, winning on a platform to remove the then superintendent of schools.
He went on to run unsuccessfully for mayor in 1973, and then he unseated then Ward 1 Alderman Jim McCarthy in 1975 and sat on the board for one term before losing the seat to Tim Creedon in 1977. He spent most of the rest of this time splitting his time between teaching and being a political consultant behind the scenes for many candidates not just in Somerville but all over Massachusetts. His last three attempts at public office were in 1989, 1991 and 1993 against then Ward 6 Alderman Jack Connolly, which, while unsuccessful, produced some of the most memorable political literature in local political history.
“I know the issues. I have the time to devote to this important role in the community, and I have the experience to work with the right people to be effective,” he said.
He went on to explain that his priorities, if elected, would be to push Green Technology, paying more attention to public safety issues and creating a stronger relationship with Tufts University.
“I’m running because I think this ward could use a full-time alderman I have the time to devote to the important issues of not just the ward, but the city as a whole while on the board,” he said.
Chisholm expects to campaign as hard as he ever has for the Ward 6 alderman seat this year and plans on working hard to make his campaign all about the issues.
One thing is for sure, issues or not, the highlight of this next local political cycle will be waiting to see what new political literature Charles produces every week.
I have no intention of leaving Somerville.
Posted by: Somerville Resident | July 16, 2007 at 04:57 PM
Tricky,
"Cambriville ambassador to Moultonborough"
"chumming the waters"
I love you more and more...............
As for the affordability of Cambriville for the Trickettes??? See if you can get them jobs at DPW. I hear the OT is fabulous. It's enough for some of them to even buy a place on a NH lake....say Moultonborough???????
Chumming the waters.......
Dr. Mrs. McCarthy
PS. Hello Charles. 'member me???? NO? Well I never! Then again some say you never did either.................
Posted by: Dr. Mrs. McCarthy | July 16, 2007 at 06:26 PM
I'm so happy to be doing this. Ron you wrote, "a lifelong Someville resident." Surely when posting about the city you live in you should be able to spell it right, no? I feel like I just threw cryptonite in Superman's face. Take that Newman! Full disclosure --- I actually do't mind Newman's grammarian antics but I'm always happy to catch a man.
Posted by: Take that Newman! | July 16, 2007 at 06:48 PM
I think Ron meant to write "lifelong Cambriville resident" but flubbed it.
Nice catch, by the way, but is "do't" supposed to be pronounced like something Homer Simpson would say?
D'oh!
Posted by: Tricky | July 16, 2007 at 06:57 PM
You got me there. (But surely you meant Kryptonite? ;-)
Posted by: Ron Newman | July 16, 2007 at 06:59 PM
TIE! Good game though.
Posted by: Somerville Resident | July 16, 2007 at 07:18 PM
Damnit Newman!
Posted by: Take that Newman! | July 16, 2007 at 07:18 PM
The suggestion by "Ron Newman" that I am, in reality, Charles Chisholm, is as absurd as my saying that "Ron Newman" is really "Newman" from "Seinfeld". Mr. Chisholm is more than capable of speaking for himself; and I am sure that he will in the days and weeks ahead. Former House Speaker Tip O'Neill once said that "all politics is local". In those few words he summed up the very essence of politics and the art of governing. He was a political master who knew how to get things accomplished, not only for his constituents, but for the nation as well. I too believe that all politics is local and have many concerns about the current Ward Six Alderman's ability to represent the ward effectively. The residents of Ward Six expect their alderman to work hard for their ward in a professional manner, and with civility and respect towards others. Alderman Gewirtz has not done this. In fact, she has done just the opposite. In many ways, she is the typical sterotype of the trendy and faddish political operative who moves into town and lights up the sky like a roman candle. She lit up the sky very bright at first, but has now burnt herself out, leaving nothing tangible to show for her first term in office. In many ways it is very sad. Progressives, like myself, initially had high hopes for this alderman. Those hopes have been shattered and replaced by a feeling of emptiness at the specter of her dreadful performance. The complaints that I have heard run far and wide throughout the ward. Yet she has not, and apparently will not, recognize that like Tip O'Neill once said..."All politics is local". Whenever an elected official fails to heed Tip's sage advice, that official does not deserve re-election. Accordingly, "Princess Rebecca" must go. This progressive will vote for CHISHOLM for a change in the fall.
Posted by: No Friend of Princess Rebecca | July 16, 2007 at 07:34 PM
No, it's not as absurd. It is entirely plausible that you are indeed CC. It is not plausible at all that Ron is Newman from Seinfeld. The mere fact you bring up this ridiculous analogy indicates you have something to hide.
If you are CC you would not reveal it, obviously... So, please remind us: A compelling reason for us to believe you is....
Posted by: Somerville Resident | July 16, 2007 at 07:51 PM
Does anyone have opinions or thoughts on Bob Adams, who is also running for Ward 6 Alderman? I don't know much about him.
Thanks
Posted by: Antoine Walker | July 16, 2007 at 08:20 PM
All politics is YOKEL!
Posted by: SomersGettheShaft | July 16, 2007 at 10:36 PM
Bingo!
Posted by: Somerville Resident | July 16, 2007 at 10:43 PM
In response to "Somerville Resident", I would like to repeat, for the second time, that I am not Charles Chisholm. I am certainly a lot younger than the good professor and I don't believe that I write as well as he does. However, "Somerville Resident"'s writing bears a surprising resemblence to that of Senator Patricia Jehlen. Could it be that "Progressive Pat" is writing anonymous blurbs under a false pseudonym in the Somerville News to save her faltering protege's campaign? I would have to concede that it is probably more plausible than Ron Newman being "Newman" from "Seinfeld".
Posted by: No Friend of Princess Rebecca | July 16, 2007 at 11:11 PM
Yes, if you don't watch it you got the Pulitzer prize coming your way. Talk about wannabes in Somerville.
Posted by: Somerville Resident | July 16, 2007 at 11:27 PM
My (No) Friend, although it is clear you are not Charles Chisholm, you've got a certain flare for political rhetoric.
It's pretty obvious that even if Pat Jehlen was posting here that she would have uncorked the immortal "If she sucks so bad and you have good evidence for it, then she'll lose."
It's also seems that in referring to our state senator as "Progressive Pat" that
you've got an axe to grind with her as well. Why in God's name do you identify yourself as a Progressive when it's perfectly clear from your writing that, indeed, you are not?
Posted by: Tricky | July 16, 2007 at 11:54 PM
With all due respect to "Tricky"...I am a liberal progressive...not a phony progressive...like some of those who use the "progressive" moniker to advance their own political careers. There is a difference..but it not always clear to the casual observer. And as far as Senator Jehlen is concerned..we agree on a lot of issues. But there are areas in which I don't agree...like her support of incompetent cyphers like "Princess Rebecca" who embarrass and hurt the real progressive social and political agendas.
Posted by: No Friend of Princess Rebecca | July 17, 2007 at 12:13 AM
Hey 'No Friend of Princess Rebecca', I think you have brought up some interesting points. But there is no way to refute people or really even take offense at their accusations if you use a pseudonym when posting. I'm not saying you have to reveal who you are in order to make an impassioned plea. I'm just putting in perspective why - even if I'm inclined to agree with you - I personally can't take your posts with the seriousness you clearly wish them to be taken. Kind of the price of anonymity.
Posted by: Solh Zendeh | July 17, 2007 at 11:58 AM
Sohl,
Most of the good posters on this site use pseudonyms. Two of the worst (you and Newmie) don't. I take the anonymous bloggers far more seriously because they bring the best stories to the site. Kind of the price of Narcissism.
Posted by: Wake up Sohl | July 17, 2007 at 02:21 PM
I don't live in Ward 6, and I don't really know Ms. Gewirtz.
I tend to assume that people who say things like, "she is the typical sterotype of the trendy and faddish political operative," do so because they can't describe specific examples of actions or behaviors that they object to. In the same way, when I hear someone say, "she (or he) is doing a great job," the only thing it tells me is that the speaker personally likes that person.
Mostly. what I read in this thread is a lot of back-and-forth puss flinging. I would be interested in hearing specific evidence from people who believe that Alderman Gewirtz is doing a good job, and from those who believe that she is not.
I also want to appreicate Charles Chisolm for objecting to the kind of name calling that's taken the place of dialog.
Posted by: Truth Fan | July 17, 2007 at 06:20 PM
I agree with the comments of Truth Fan. There does tend to be a lot of back and forth puss flinging that goes on with these commentaries. However, we do live in a democracy and spirited debate over issues and candidates does occur in many ways and on different forums (i.e. newspapers, television, candidate forums, political rallies, internet chat rooms, cyber cafes, and even myspace). It is important to remember that we will never see "all of the people agree all of the time". There are those on this forum who will disagree with what I have to say and vice versa. However, I will never accuse those who disagree with me of being "evil people" whose voices should not be heard. What we are doing with our commentaries in this forum is the very essence of democracy and freedom of speech. Some of us choose to identify ourselves publicly by supplying our real names. Some people supply either false names or pseudonyms. One need only look at the interesting commentaries posted on the Somerville News over the years to understand what goes on here. But this is democracy at its core. I may not agree with what you say...but I will certainly defend your right to say it. That having been said, I believe that the current Ward Six Alderman has failed miserably in her position. We, the taxpayers of Ward Six, pay this alderman $30,000 each year to represent us. Yet, "Princess Rebecca" is more interested in mouthing pithy slogans like "Free Mumi" than providing essential services for the residents of Ward Six. She might be thinking globally, but she is not acting locally. As it stands now, she can't get a street light fixed. And what about her nose in the air look that she maintains...like an impudent snob who is too important for the "little people" of Somerville. I have spoken with many people in Ward Six over the past several months. They are not only not impressed, some of them are appalled. Everything this alderman seems to do requires an apology letter to her constituents. The only problem is, the apology never comes. He recent meltdown with the President of the Board of Alderman was the final straw. "Princess Rebecca" is not only dysfunctional, she is radioactive as well. This year the voters of Ward Six need to elect a real alderman; not a vacuum. We need to elect a doer; not a talker. I urge everyone in Ward Six to vote for a change in November and give Charles Chisholm a chance. And should Alderman Chisholm not respect the will of the people in Ward Six...we can vote him out of office in 2009 as well. After all, this is what democracy is all about.
Posted by: No Friend of Princess Rebecca | July 17, 2007 at 09:19 PM
What is a "Mumi" and which merchant is giving it away free?
Posted by: Ron Newman | July 17, 2007 at 09:47 PM
Mumi is more often Mumia. He's a man in prison by the name of Mumia Abu-Jamal.
Posted by: Craig | July 17, 2007 at 10:07 PM
What does Mumia have to do with Somerville politics?
Posted by: Somerville Resident | July 17, 2007 at 10:32 PM
'Wake up Sohl', I take it as a compliment that a coward such as yourself wasn't even able to spell my name correctly. Having the stones to identify yourself when you are insulting someone has nothing to do with Narcissism, but in your case, it obviously has to something to do with base IQ.
Posted by: solh zendeh | July 18, 2007 at 08:02 AM
You know, I made a mistake posting what I did this morning. I'm not interested in getting into a pissing match with anyone on this board - it's really not enjoyable for me, and it's not what I personally read and post for.
That said, I stand by my statement to 'No Friend of Princess Rebecca', which is that even if I'm inclined to agree with what you are saying, it's not reasonable to expect total trust when you post anonymously.
Posted by: Solh Zendeh | July 18, 2007 at 11:48 AM
Well said, Solh. Especially from somebody who brags in the same posts that in politics all is permitted.
Posted by: Somerville Resident | July 18, 2007 at 11:56 AM
Solh, Sohl, or whoever you are,
Relax Francis. It's not unreasonable to get attacked on this blog after you attack someone. The guy was probably just trying to get your goat and he succeeded. Take this site for what it is, a general discussion on topics.
Posted by: Go Figure | July 18, 2007 at 02:06 PM
We at Somerville Politics feel that Charles Chisholm would probably be a good ward alderman. But the real question is, "Why replace Ald. Gewirtz now?"
Ald. Gewirtz has had some slip ups, most noted on this blog. But, if one views her record over her first two years as Ward 6 Alderman, one must conclude that she is doing a pretty good job.
Ald. Gewirtz in coordination with Davis Sq. businesses and the Mayor's Office, holds meetings in Davis Sq. to discuss issues important to both residents and businesses. The most notable success of those meetings has been the Burren being granted a 2AM liquor license on condition that it reports to these meeting for a certain period of time. Such a condition allows for a dialog between the Burren, other businesses, and residents in the Davis Sq. area. Ald. Gewirtz responds to constituent concerns. Ald. Gewirtz is furthering the work of the Mayor to bring green technology to the City. Simply put, her accomplishments far outweigh her blunders.
Ward 6 voters should recognize that they have a committed Alderman in Rebekah Gewirtz and should give her another term in office to grow and continue to better Ward 6 and the City.
Posted by: Somerville Politics | July 22, 2007 at 11:13 PM
If I were Rebecca, I wouldn't be saying too much about how I extended the Burren's operating hours until 2 in the morning or how I fought on behalf of the Someday Cafe. Most of the other supposed accomplishments that she's had are meaningless fluff as far as I'm concerned. Furthering the work of the mayor to bring green technology? Gimme a break. I'd like to see the 3 of these candidates debate. I definitely want to hear from Mr. Adams since I already know Charlie from his past campaigns in the Ward and I don't think he has much more to add to his play book.
Posted by: PersonDavis... | July 23, 2007 at 06:52 AM
We at Somerville Politics just posted our prediction for the Ward 6 race. It is available here. Check it out and tell us what you think! (But, after that, come back to The Somerville News).
Posted by: Somerville Politics | July 28, 2007 at 03:59 PM
Let me guess, before I even click (gotta help their little "hit counter" they're so proud of, no?): 1) Continuation of the smear campaign against Progressives (perhaps more of the "is it just me or candidate X looks awkward?" type of observation; possibly camouflaged among other innocuous stuff. 2) Reasons why the more rational and deserving Charles Chisholm candidate will win.
On your little site, you forgot to add "I'm Charles Chisholm and I approve of this message".
Posted by: Prediction | July 28, 2007 at 05:00 PM
I thought repeatedly advertising another website here was not allowed?
Posted by: Ron Newman | July 28, 2007 at 10:28 PM
Unless....
Posted by: Democracy | July 28, 2007 at 11:33 PM
Remember Mr. Newman, We link to The Somerville News as well. We know JN's rules, but hope that The Somerville News will allow links to our site if we continue to link to The Somerville News site.
What is your issue with us anyway?
Posted by: Somerville Politics | July 29, 2007 at 12:32 AM
Ron and other already pointed out the issue with you: The fact that you keep yourself/yourselves anonymous is highly suspicious. As a result, nobody will take any information you post seriously.
The funny thing is that it is quite obvious somebody associated with CC (if not CC himself) is behind it.
Posted by: The issue with you... | July 29, 2007 at 12:42 AM
CC means carbon copy. Who is carbon copy?
Posted by: Somerville Politics | July 29, 2007 at 01:21 AM
Actually, "cc" means carbon copy, not "CC."
Posted by: Go Figure | July 29, 2007 at 05:05 AM